FurnaceTallyInput BTU, output BTU, and the gap nobody explains.

What size furnace does a 1000 sq ft house in San Francisco, CA need?

1,000 ft² in San Francisco, CA — 96% AFUE
40,000BTU/hr input
38,400 BTU/hr actually delivered — sized from a 35°F design day
1,000 ft² in San Francisco, CA — 96% AFUE40,000 BTU/hrFurnace input rat…38,400 BTU/hrHeat actually del…30,400 BTU/hrCalculated heat l…167 thermsGas used per heat…
Furnace input rating to buy40,000BTU/hr
Heat actually delivered40,000 × 96% AFUE — the number that heats the house38,400BTU/hr
Calculated heat loss1,000 ft² × 30.4 BTU/ft²30,400BTU/hr
Winter design temperature99% design dry bulb, 2015–2024 — colder on about 4 days a year35°F
Design temperature difference70°F indoors against 35°F outdoors — this sets the whole calculation35°F
Heat loss per square foot9.4 + 0.60 × 35°F30.4BTU/ft²
Heating degree daysbase 65°F, annual average2,346°F-days
Nights at or below freezing1nights/yr
Gas used per heating seasonfrom measured household consumption, not from the sizing figure above167therms
Heating cost per yearat $1.42/therm, the national residential average$237
Oversize after rounding upa full size step above the load — see the note26%
Same house at a 35°F design day30,400BTU/hr
Same house at a −20°F design day2.09× spread for the identical building63,400BTU/hr

Notes

  • San Francisco designs to 35°F, and that single number drives everything above. Heat loss is very close to a straight line in the indoor–outdoor difference, so a 35°F design difference gives 30.4 BTU per square foot per hour. The same house needs 30 MBH on a 35°F design day and 63 MBH at −20°F — a factor of 2.09, which is why a national "40 BTU per square foot" figure is useless in both directions.
  • Two BTU numbers, and the box shows the bigger one. A 40,000 BTU/hr furnace at 96% AFUE puts 38,400 BTU/hr into the house; the rest goes up the flue. condensing, the common high-efficiency tier. The mistake to avoid is keeping the old input rating when moving to a higher efficiency — swapping an 80% unit for a 96% unit at the same input adds 6,400 BTU/hr of delivered heat the house never asked for.
  • 40,000 BTU/hr is 26% above the calculated loss. Input ratings step in 20,000 BTU jumps and there is nothing in between, so this house lands well up the step. A two-stage or modulating furnace fixes it properly: it runs long, low and quiet at part load instead of firing full-tilt for eight minutes and stopping. Single-stage equipment at this size will short cycle through most of the winter.
  • Fuel, roughly — and it does not come from the number above. 2,346 heating degree days on a 1,000 ft² house works out to about 167 therms a season, 237 dollars at the national average gas price. That figure is calibrated against what households actually burn, not scaled from the sizing rule of thumb — and the two disagree by a factor of about 3.1, because the sizing table is deliberately conservative. Going from 80% to 96% AFUE here saves roughly $47 a year against an installed price difference usually in the $1,000–2,000 range, so the payback is a real calculation and not an obvious yes.
  • This is a heat loss estimate, not a Manual J. The real one counts window area and orientation, insulation R-values, measured air leakage, ceiling height, duct location and how many people live in the house. A tight new build in San Francisco can come in a third below this figure; a 1950s house with original windows and no wall insulation can come in a third above. Ask for the Manual J before signing — it costs a few hundred dollars on a $5,000–10,000 installation, and it is the only thing that turns the number above into a specification.
  • Where the design temperature comes from. It is the 1st percentile of daily low temperatures at Metro Oakland International Airport, 18 km from downtown San Francisco, over 2015–2024 — the same kind of airport station ASHRAE measures at. The percentile was calibrated against eight airports with published ASHRAE values and reproduces them to within 2.2°F on average. Expect a degree or two of difference from a printed table; that is far smaller than the uncertainty in the house itself.

The short answer

A 1000 square foot house in San Francisco, CA needs a furnace rated about 40,000 BTU per hour of input at 96% AFUE, which delivers 38,400 BTU/hr into the house.

Where that number comes from

San Francisco, CA designs to 35°F — the temperature it drops below on roughly four nights a year. Against 70°F indoors that is a 35°F difference, and heat loss is very nearly a straight line in that difference: 30.4 BTU per square foot per hour here.

This is the reason a single national "40 BTU per square foot" figure is wrong in both directions. The same house wants 30,400 BTU/hr where the design night is 35°F and 63,400 BTU/hr where it is −20°F.

Input is not output

The rating on the box is fuel burned, not heat delivered. At 96% AFUE a 40,000 BTU/hr furnace puts 38,400 BTU/hr into the rooms. Keeping the old input rating when moving to a higher efficiency is the most common way a replacement ends up oversized.

What it costs to run

San Francisco, CA runs 2,346 heating degree days a year. This house at 96% AFUE burns roughly 167 therms a season — about $237 at the national average gas price.

Before you buy

Ask for the Manual J. A few hundred dollars on a five-figure installation, and it is the only thing that turns the estimate above into a specification.

Nearby sizes

Read more